01
Registry-sourced.
Not vendor-submitted.
Official government registries. No aggregators. No scraped data.
Your VoP passed. The company dissolved. The wire went anyway.
01
Registry-sourced.
Not vendor-submitted.
Official government registries. No aggregators. No scraped data.
02
Three verdicts.
Every time.
Confirmed. Mismatch. Unverifiable. Actionable in one step.
03
The deadline is
July 2027.
Procurement cycles take 6–9 months. Start now.
04
Compliance officers
need verdicts.
Not scores.
Regulators don't audit confidence scores. They audit sources.
Continuous Monitoring
Entities change after onboarding. sikker.me never stops watching.
AMLA codifies government registries as required verification sources under Article 22(6)(a) — deadline July 10, 2026. Procurement cycles run 6–9 months. The clock has started.
FIS — inside 12% of the world's banks — just deployed agentic AML with one requirement: every conclusion must cite its source. The Registry Verification Record sikker.me produces already meets that standard.
Market
11B
SEPA transactions per year. VoP mandatory on all of them since October 2025.
34%
Grey-zone VoP results in France with no resolution tool. Resolving 1% at €0.10/check = €37M annual revenue from one country.
3,000+
Invoice financing companies becoming obliged entities under AMLR (July 2027). Penalties up to 10% of annual turnover.
$579B
Annual bank fraud cost. BEC alone: $3.05B in the US in 2025. In April 2026, Zephyr Energy lost £700,000 from a single changed routing number.
Every payment. Every payee. Every European company. That is the market.
ECB Payments Statistics 2025 · Natixis CIB, "Verification of Payee: A Promising Start," March 2026 · AMLR 2024/1624 + EBA estimates · Nasdaq Verafin 2026 Global Financial Crime Report · FBI IC3 Annual Report 2025 · Zephyr Energy, LSE regulatory filing, April 2026
VoP checks the bank. We check the company.
| Capability | VoP | sikker.me |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Bank's internal name record | Official government registry |
| Returns close-match result | Requires manual resolution | |
| Detects company dissolution | ||
| Director / ownership changes | ||
| Post-onboarding monitoring | ||
| Regulator-grade audit trail | ||
| Verdict traceable to named source |
| Capability | KYB / AML vendors | sikker.me |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous monitoring | ||
| Registry-authoritative data | Partial (often scraped / indirect) | |
| Verdict, not a risk score | Score outputs | |
| Resolves VoP grey-zone results | ||
| No workflow change | ||
| Verdict traceable to named registry | Partial |
Every major Western European registry. Direct.
Registry-primary architecture. Direct API access — not aggregator-sourced. Every verdict is traceable to a named authoritative government source.
Under AMLR Article 22(6)(a), identity must be verified through "reliable and independent sources." Direct integrations with official government registries meet that standard at source.
One API call. Three seconds. A record your regulator can read. · Illustrative
Proceed — or hold the payment?
RISK
ILLUSTRATIVE OUTCOMES
model: continuous pre-payment graph verification
escalation: event-driven, sub-2s verdict
baseline: unverified payment flow
€250M
+€50M
At this exposure level, graph verification protects an estimated €98M more than an unverified flow over 5 years.
GRAPH-VERIFIED
Continuous. Every wire.
€490M
SPOT-CHECK
Periodic. Manual.
€443M
UNVERIFIED
Onboarding only.
€392M
Cumulative value protected vs value at risk
Illustrative model. Compares cumulative value retained across three verification approaches using fixed annual scenario rates (graph-verified 0.5%, spot-check 3.0%, unverified 6.0%). Scenario inputs are illustrative upper-bound estimates, not sourced fraud rates. Actual outcomes depend on payment volume, industry, and operational controls. Not a guarantee of outcome.
FAQ
Not exactly. sikker.me is a continuous verification layer — not a rule-based fraud screener. It tells you, before a payment executes, whether the payee relationship is verified against the official government registry of their jurisdiction. Prevention is the outcome. Verification is the mechanism.
REQUEST ACCESS
Join the design partner program.
We are onboarding a select group of invoice financing companies, payment teams, and platforms to build alongside us. Leave your details — we will reach out within one business day.
Liability exposure estimate. Grey-zone rate sourced from Natixis CIB, March 2026, 180M transactions. Your actual exposure depends on payment volume and average value. The 6.0% rate is an illustrative worst-case; AFP data suggests actual B2B fraud loss rates of 0.1–0.8% of payment volume. Not a guarantee of outcome.