Skip to content

Verify every wire.
Before it leaves.

Your VoP passed. The company dissolved. The wire went anyway.

Fraud lives in the gap between onboarding and today's wire.

01

Registry-sourced.
Not vendor-submitted.

Official government registries. No aggregators. No scraped data.

02

Three verdicts.
Every time.

Confirmed. Mismatch. Unverifiable. Actionable in one step.

03

The deadline is
July 2027.

Procurement cycles take 6–9 months. Start now.

04

Compliance officers
need verdicts.
Not scores.

Regulators don't audit confidence scores. They audit sources.

Continuous Monitoring

Most tools verify
at onboarding.
Nobody watches after.

DirectorsAccountsOwnership

Entities change after onboarding. sikker.me never stops watching.

AMLA codifies government registries as required verification sources under Article 22(6)(a) — deadline July 10, 2026. Procurement cycles run 6–9 months. The clock has started.

FIS — inside 12% of the world's banks — just deployed agentic AML with one requirement: every conclusion must cite its source. The Registry Verification Record sikker.me produces already meets that standard.

Market

The market is every B2B payment in Europe.

11B

SEPA transactions per year. VoP mandatory on all of them since October 2025.

34%

Grey-zone VoP results in France with no resolution tool. Resolving 1% at €0.10/check = €37M annual revenue from one country.

3,000+

Invoice financing companies becoming obliged entities under AMLR (July 2027). Penalties up to 10% of annual turnover.

$579B

Annual bank fraud cost. BEC alone: $3.05B in the US in 2025. In April 2026, Zephyr Energy lost £700,000 from a single changed routing number.

Every payment. Every payee. Every European company. That is the market.

ECB Payments Statistics 2025  ·  Natixis CIB, "Verification of Payee: A Promising Start," March 2026  ·  AMLR 2024/1624 + EBA estimates  ·  Nasdaq Verafin 2026 Global Financial Crime Report  ·  FBI IC3 Annual Report 2025  ·  Zephyr Energy, LSE regulatory filing, April 2026

VoP checks the bank. We check the company.

Not a replacement. A missing layer in your payment stack.

VoP tells you the IBAN matches.
We tell you the company is real.

CapabilityVoPsikker.me
Data sourceBank's internal name recordOfficial government registry
Returns close-match resultRequires manual resolution
Detects company dissolution
Director / ownership changes
Post-onboarding monitoring
Regulator-grade audit trail
Verdict traceable to named source

KYB vendors verify at onboarding.
We watch continuously.

CapabilityKYB / AML vendorssikker.me
Continuous monitoring
Registry-authoritative dataPartial (often scraped / indirect)
Verdict, not a risk scoreScore outputs
Resolves VoP grey-zone results
No workflow change
Verdict traceable to named registryPartial

Every major Western European registry. Direct.

Every major Western European registry.
Direct.

RCS · FranceRegistro delle Imprese · ItalyKvK · NetherlandsHandelsregister · GermanyBolagsverket · SwedenCVR · DenmarkFirmenbuch · Austriaand more

Registry-primary architecture. Direct API access — not aggregator-sourced. Every verdict is traceable to a named authoritative government source.

Under AMLR Article 22(6)(a), identity must be verified through "reliable and independent sources." Direct integrations with official government registries meet that standard at source.

One API call. Three seconds. A record your regulator can read. · Illustrative

RISK

The cost of an unverifiedpayment flow.

ILLUSTRATIVE OUTCOMES

model: continuous pre-payment graph verification

escalation: event-driven, sub-2s verdict

baseline: unverified payment flow

5

€250M

+€50M

At this exposure level, graph verification protects an estimated €98M more than an unverified flow over 5 years.

GRAPH-VERIFIED

Continuous. Every wire.

€490M

SPOT-CHECK

Periodic. Manual.

€443M

UNVERIFIED

Onboarding only.

€392M

Cumulative value protected vs value at risk

Unverified · €392MSpot-check · €443MGraph-verified · €490M

Illustrative model. Compares cumulative value retained across three verification approaches using fixed annual scenario rates (graph-verified 0.5%, spot-check 3.0%, unverified 6.0%). Scenario inputs are illustrative upper-bound estimates, not sourced fraud rates. Actual outcomes depend on payment volume, industry, and operational controls. Not a guarantee of outcome.

FAQ

Common questions.

Not exactly. sikker.me is a continuous verification layer — not a rule-based fraud screener. It tells you, before a payment executes, whether the payee relationship is verified against the official government registry of their jurisdiction. Prevention is the outcome. Verification is the mechanism.

REQUEST ACCESS

Join the design partner program.

We are onboarding a select group of invoice financing companies, payment teams, and platforms to build alongside us. Leave your details — we will reach out within one business day.

By submitting this form, you agree to the processing of your personal data in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

sikker.me is the verification layer for European B2B payments — stopping BEC before the wire, resolving VoP grey zones, and confirming every supplier is real against the official government registry of their country. Built for the post-VoP compliance landscape. AMLR-ready from day one.

© 2026 Sikker. All rights reserved.